Bugoni v. Coffman, et al

Filing 80

ORDER granting defendants leave to file their motion for summary judgment re 69 . ORDER denying 77 plaintiff's Counter-Motion to Strike. Plaintiff shall respond to defendants' motion no later than 3/29/10. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/15/10.(TLJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Piero A. Bugoni, Plaintiff, vs. Coffman, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-04-01345-PHX-FJM ORDER The court has before it plaintiff Piero Bugoni's "Preliminary Response to Defense Second Motion for Summary Judgment and Counter-Motion to Strike" (docs. 76 & 77). Plaintiff moves to strike defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 69) because they did not move for leave to file such a motion as we requested during a scheduling conference held on June 25, 2009 (doc. 54). In our scheduling order of March 8, 2010 (doc. 75), we directed plaintiff to "file a response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, together with a separate Statement of Facts and supporting affidavits or other appropriate exhibits, no later than March 29, 2010." To the extent that our order was ambiguous, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING defendants leave to file their motion for summary judgment (doc. 69). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's counter-motion to strike (doc. 77). Pursuant to our scheduling order (doc. 75), plaintiff shall respond to defendants' motion no later than March 29, 2010. DATED this 15th day of March, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?