Hy Cite Corporation v. Badbusinessbureau.co, et al

Filing 67

Notice re WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY AS COUNSEL OF RECORD by Hy Cite Corporation (Dana, Michael) Modified on 12/28/2006, DOCUMENT IS UNSIGNED, ATTORENY NOTICED TO REFILE, (LSP).

Download PDF
Hy Cite Corporation v. Badbusinessbureau.co, et al Doc. 67 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John C. Scheller (admitted pro hac vice; Wis. SBN No. 1031247) Kevin M. St. John (admitted pro hac vice; Wis. SBN No. 1054815) MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP One South Pinckney Street, Suite 700 Madison, WI 53703 (608) 257-3501 Don Bivens, No 005134 Michael K. Dana, No. 019047 SNELL & WILMER, LLP One Arizona Center Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000 Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Hy Cite Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) badbusinessbureau.com, L.L.C., a St. ) Kitts/Nevis Corporation d/b/a ) badbusinessbureau.com and/or ) ripoffreport.com and/or ) badbusinessbureau.com/Rip-Off Report.com; ) Xcentric Ventures, LLC, an Arizona Limited ) Liability Company d/b/a ) badbusinessbureau.com and/or ) ripoffreport.com and/or ) badbusinessbureau.com/Rip-Off Report.com; ) and Ed Magedson, an Arizona resident, ) ) Defendants. ) No: CV04-2856 PHX EHC NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY AS COUNSEL OF RECORD PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that as of December 31, 2006, Kevin M. St. John (admitted pro hac vice) will no longer be employed by the law firm of Michael Best & Friedrich LLP and no longer in the private practice of law, and thus hereby withdraws as a counsel of record in the above-entitled case. Attorney John C. Scheller at Michael Best & Friedrich LLP as well as Attorneys Don Bivens and Michael K. Dana at Snell & Wilmer, LLP will continue to represent Plaintiff Hy Cite Corporation in this matter. 1933285.1 Case 2:04-cv-02856-EHC Document 67 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?