Massoli v. Regan Media, et al

Filing 47

Massoli v. Regan Media, et al

Doc. 47

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
LAW OFFICES

James L. Blair, #016125 Roger W. Hall, #013727 RENAUD COOK DRURY MESAROS, PA Phelps Dodge Tower One North Central, Suite 900 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4417 [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA JENNA MASSOLI p/k/a JENNA JAMESON, Plaintiff, v. "REGAN MEDIA," JUDITH REGAN, as an individual, Defendant. REGAN MEDIA, INC., a New York corporation, and JUDITH REGAN, an individual, Defendants/Counterclaimants, v. JENNA MASSOLI, p/k/a JENNA JAMESON, an individual, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, and JAY GRDINA, an individual, Third-Party Counterdefendant. /// /// CV 05-0854 PHX EHC RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS/ COUNTERCLAIMANTS' MOTION TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM (Assigned to the Honorable Earl H. Carroll)

RENAUD COOK DRURY MESAROS
ONE NORTH CENTRAL SUITE 900 PHOENIX, AZ 85004 TELEPHONE [phone] FACSIMILE 602-307-5853

C e 1) (Pagase

2:05-cv-00854-EHC

Document 47

Filed 09/26/2005 Page 1 of 3 @PFDesktop\::ODMA/MHODMA/IMANAGE;RCD_PHX;312170;1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
LAW OFFICES

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Jenna Massoli, p/k/a Jenna Jameson and counterdefendant Jay Grdina (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), by and through their counsel undersigned, hereby submit this Response to the Motion to Amend Counterclaim ("Motion to Amend") filed by defendants/counterclaimants Judith Regan and Regan Media, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"). Plaintiffs have no objection to Defendants filing a second amended counterclaim, since the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as established case law, both militate in favor of permitting liberal amendments to a party's pleadings. By not opposing that filing, Plaintiffs however, in no way admit, concede, or agree with the innumerable false assertions and misstatements contained in the Motion to Amend. Since Defendants' Motion to Amend would doubtless be granted (and properly so) even if Plaintiffs filed a lengthy response detailing each and every one of Defendants' falsehoods, Plaintiffs have opted to spare the Court such bickering and simply consent to the amendment, in order to move this case forward. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 26th day of September, 2005. RENAUD COOK DRURY MESAROS, PA

By:

/s/ Roger W. Hall James L. Blair Roger W. Hall Phelps Dodge Tower One North Central, Suite 900 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4417 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants

The foregoing was filed electronically this 26th day of September, 2005. COPY of the foregoing was hand-delivered to the Honorable Earl H. Carroll this 27th day of September, 2005.

RENAUD COOK DRURY MESAROS
ONE NORTH CENTRAL SUITE 900 PHOENIX, AZ 85004 TELEPHONE [phone] FACSIMILE 602-307-5853

COPY of the foregoing mailed this 26th day of September, 2005, to: C e 2) (Pagase 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 47 Filed 09/26/2005 Page 2 of 3 @PFDesktop\::ODMA/MHODMA/IMANAGE;RCD_PHX;312170;1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
LAW OFFICES

David J. Bodney, Esq. Dennis K. Blackhurst, Esq. STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP Collier Center 201 East Washington Street, Ste 1600 Phoenix, AZ 85004-2382 Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants /s/ Deborah Robertson
@PFDesktop\::ODMA/MHODMA/IMANAGE;RCD_PHX;312170;1

RENAUD COOK DRURY MESAROS
ONE NORTH CENTRAL SUITE 900 PHOENIX, AZ 85004 TELEPHONE [phone] FACSIMILE 602-307-5853

C e 3) (Pagase

2:05-cv-00854-EHC

Document 47

Filed 09/26/2005 Page 3 of 3 @PFDesktop\::ODMA/MHODMA/IMANAGE;RCD_PHX;312170;1