Massoli v. Regan Media, et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION TO VACATE OCTOBER 3, 2005 ORAL ARGUMENT by Regan Media, Judith Regan, Regan Media, Judith Regan. (Blackhurst, Dennis)

Download PDF
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al Doc. 49 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP Collier Center 201 East Washington Street, Suite 1600 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2382 Telephone: (602) 257-5200 Facsimile: (602) 257-5299 David J. Bodney (006065) Dennis K. Blackhurst (021678) Attorneys for Defendants Regan Media, Inc. and Judith Regan UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA JENNA MASSOLI p/k/a JENNA MASSOLI, Plaintiff, vs. " EGAN MEDIA," JUDITH R and REGAN, an individual, Defendants. REGAN MEDIA, INC., a New York corporation, and JUDITH REGAN, an individual, Defendants/Counterclaimants, vs. JENNA MASSOLI p/k/a JENNA MASSOLI, an individual, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, and JAY GRDINA, an individual, Third-Party Counterdefendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 05-0854 PHX EHC STIPULATION TO VACATE OCTOBER 3, 2005 ORAL ARGUMENT (Assigned to the Honorable Earl H. Carroll) Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 49 Filed 09/28/2005 Page 1 of 3 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendants/Counterclaimants Regan Media, Inc. and Judith Regan (collectively, " egan" and Plaintiff/Counterdefendants Jenna Massoli and Jay Grdina (collectively, R ) " assoli" stipulate and agree that the oral argument currently scheduled for October 3, M ) 2005 on Plaintiff/Counterdefendants'Rule 56(f) Motion should be vacated. This Stipulation is based on the following circumstances. On September 9, 2005, Regan moved to amend its Counterclaim, and Massoli has not objected to that Motion. Assuming the Court grants the Motion to Amend and Regan is permitted to file and serve its Amended Counterclaim, Regan intends to withdraw its pending Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and Massoli' Rule 56(f) Motion will then become moot. s Under the circumstances, it serves neither judicial economy nor the parties' interests to proceed with the hearing on October 3, 2005. Respectfully submitted this 28th day of September, 2005. STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP By /s/ David J. Bodney David J. Bodney Dennis K. Blackhurst Collier Center 201 East Washington Street Suite 1600 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2382 Attorneys for Defendants/ Counterclaimants Regan Media, Inc. and Judith Regan RENAUD COOK DRURY & MESAROS, PA By /s/ Roger W. Hall James L. Blair Roger W. Hall Phelps Dodge Tower One North Central, Suite 900 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4417 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Jenna Massoli p/k/a Jenna Jameson and Third-Party Counterdefendant Jay Grdina 2 Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 49 Filed 09/28/2005 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 28th day of September, 2005, I caused the attached document to be electronically transmitted to the Clerk'Office using the CM/ECF System s for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electric Filing to the following CM/ECF Registrants: James L. Blair Roger William Hall Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros, PA Phelps Dodge Tower One North Central, Suite 900 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4417 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Third-Party Counterdefendant I hereby certify that on the 28th day of September, 2005, I served the attached document by mail on the following, who are not registered participants of the CM/ECF System: Bernard M. Brodsky Jeffrey F. Reina Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria, LLP 42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 300 Buffalo, NY 14202-3857 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Third-Party Counterdefendant /s/ Beth E. Gibson Beth E. Gibson 4815079 3 Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 49 Filed 09/28/2005 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?