Massoli v. Regan Media, et al

Filing 76

REPLY to Response to Motion re 68 MOTION to Compel filed by Regan Media, Judith Regan. (Blackhurst, Dennis)

Download PDF
Massoli v. Regan Media, et al Doc. 76 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP Collier Center 201 East Washington Street, Suite 1600 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2382 Telephone: (602) 257-5200 Facsimile: (602) 257-5299 David J. Bodney (006065) Dennis K. Blackhurst (021678) Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants Regan Media, Inc. and Judith Regan UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA JENNA MASSOLI p/k/a JENNA JAMESON, Plaintiff, vs. " EGAN MEDIA," JUDITH R and REGAN, an individual, Defendants. REGAN MEDIA, INC., a New York corporation, and JUDITH REGAN, an individual, Defendants/Counterclaimants, vs. JENNA MASSOLI p/k/a JENNA JAMESON, an individual, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, and JAY GRDINA, an individual, and DOLCE AMORE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Counterdefendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 05-0854 PHX EHC REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT/ COUNTERCLAIMANT REGAN MEDIA' MOTION TO S COMPEL (Assigned to the Honorable Earl H. Carroll) Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 76 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 1 of 4 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 In their Response, Plaintiffs "onfess"that they have failed to produce c documents that were requested by Regan Media, Inc. (" egan" and due the first week of R ) December. [Plaintiffs' Response, at 2.] As such, Plaintiffs concede that Regan' Motion s to Compel should be granted and the Court should enter an Order (1) compelling production of the requested documents on or before February 7, 2006, and (2) awarding Regan its reasonable attorneys'fees incurred in bringing the Motion to Compel. Plaintiffs' only explanation for their failure to produce even a written response to Regan' s First Request for Production of Documents is that they were too busy with other business affairs to fulfill their obligations in the litigation they initiated. Plaintiffs say they will produce responsive documents by February 7, 2006, 15 days from the filing of their Response. [Id., at 4.] Although this production will be more than two months overdue, production of the requested documents on February 7, 2006 should allow enough time for Defendants to prepare for Plaintiffs'depositions, which are currently scheduled for February 14 and 16. (At Plaintiffs'request, the depositions of Plaintiff Counterdefendant Jenna Jameson and Counterdefendant Jay Grdina have been twice postponed already.) Any further delay by Plaintiffs, however, will prevent Defendants from preparing adequately for Plaintiffs' upcoming depositions. It merits note that Plaintiffs have failed to object to any of Defendants' document requests and have therefore waived any objections. See Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, 959 F.2d 1468, 1473 (9th Cir. 1992) (" is well established It that a failure to object to discovery requests within the time required constitutes a waiver 2 Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 76 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 of any objection" Consequently, if Plaintiffs' ). production is late again, or if Plaintiffs withhold the requested documents, then Defendants reserve their right to file a motion seeking Rule 37 sanctions, including dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims. Respectfully submitted this 30th day of January, 2006. STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP By: /s/ David J. Bodney David J. Bodney Dennis K. Blackhurst Collier Center 201 East Washington Street Suite 1600 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2382 Attorneys for Defendants/ Counterclaimants Regan Media, Inc. and Judith Regan 3 Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 76 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 30th day of January, 2006, I caused the attached document to be electronically transmitted to the Clerk'Office using the CM/ECF System s for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electric Filing to the following CM/ECF Registrants: James L. Blair Roger William Hall Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros, PA Phelps Dodge Tower One North Central, Suite 900 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4417 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Third-Party Counterdefendant I hereby certify that on the 30th day of January, 2006, I served the attached document by mail on the following, who are not registered participants of the CM/ECF System: Bernard M. Brodsky Jeffrey F. Reina Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria, LLP 42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 300 Buffalo, NY 14202-3857 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Third-Party Counterdefendant /s/ Beth Gibson Beth Gibson 490266 4 Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 76 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?