Wagstaff v. Romney, et al

Filing 7

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED granting Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Reopen Case, and the Order and Judgment entered September 19, 2005 (Docs. #4 and 5)are vacated and this case is reinstated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to the Court's Legal Staff for review. . Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 10/7/05. (TLJ, )

Download PDF
Wagstaff v. Romney, et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) E. Romney; Maricopa County Sheriffs) ) Office, ) ) Defendants. ) Bonnie Lynn Wagstaff, CV 05-864 PHX NVW ORDER The court has received plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (doc. # 6), filed September 28, 2005, which the court treats as a timely motion under Rules 59(a) and 60(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. The motion demonstrates that plaintiff's court mail was returned by error, as plaintiff was still in custody. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (doc. # 6) is granted, and the Order and Judgment entered September 19, 2005 (docs. # 4 and 5) are vacated and this case is reinstated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to the Court's Legal Staff for review. DATED this 7th day of October, 2005. Case 2:05-cv-00864-NVW--JJM Document 7 Filed 10/11/2005 Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?