Rodriguez Geronimo v. Morgan et al

Filing 4

ORDER that Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date this order is filed to pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. That the Clerk of Court is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice if within 30 days of the date this order is filed, Petitioner fails to either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed.. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 11/9/05. (TLJ, )

Download PDF
Rodriguez Geronimo v. Morgan et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO BL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Luis Camejo Rodriguez Geronimo, Petitioner, vs. Richard Morgan, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 05-3479-PHX-NVW (VAM) ORDER Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in federal custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. A habeas action requires payment of a $5.00 filing fee, see 28 U.S.C. 1914, or an application to proceed in forma pauperis without payment of the filing fee. Under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.5(b), a petitioner must pay the fee if he has more than $25.00 in his inmate account. If he has less than $25.00 in his account, he may apply to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will allow Petitioner 30 days to cure this deficiency by either paying the $5.00 fee or applying to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will direct the Clerk of Court to send him the proper form for applying to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner should note that if he fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, or any order entered in this matter, this action will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court may dismiss action for failure to comply with any court order). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) That Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date this Order is filed to pay the Document 4 Filed 11/10/2005 Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com JDDL Case 2:05-cv-03479-NVW--VAM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL $5.00 filing fee or to file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; (2) That the Clerk of Court is directed to enter dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner, if within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; (3) That at all times during the pendency of this action, Petitioner shall immediately advise the Court of any change of address and its effective date. Such notice shall be captioned "NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS." The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the change of address and its effective date. The notice shall not include any motions for any other relief. Petitioner shall serve a copy of the Notice of Change of Address on all opposing parties. Failure to file a Notice of Change of Address may result in the dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (4) That aside from the required two copies of any petition or amended petition a clear, legible copy of every other document filed with the Clerk shall accompany each original document for use by the District Judge or Magistrate Judge to whom the case is assigned. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the pleading or document being stricken without further notice to Petitioner; and (5) That the Clerk of Court is directed to provide to Petitioner the current courtapproved form for filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner. DATED this 9th day of November, 2005. Case 2:05-cv-03479-NVW--VAM -2Document 4 Filed 11/10/2005 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?