Curry v. Nicholson

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Motion for Reconsideration; setting aside this Court's Orders dismissing this case; Clerk shall re-open case; pla shall seperately file the appropriate proof of service . Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/10/06. (SBU)

Download PDF
Curry v. Nicholson Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) The Honorable R. James Nicholson, Secretary of United States Department ) ) of Veterans Affairs Agency, ) ) Defendant. ) Louis Curry, No. CV 05-3490-PHX-JAT ORDER On March 13, 2006, this Court entered a minute entry ordering the Plaintiff to Appear on March 29, 2006, and show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to serve the Defendant. The Plaintiff failed to appear at the hearing. As a result, on March 30, 2006, the Court dismissed this case without prejudice. On April 13, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration. The Plaintiff did not receive notice of the show cause hearing. Further, the Plaintiff attached an exhibit showing proof of service. /// Case 2:05-cv-03490-JAT Document 11 Filed 05/10/2006 Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having considered the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, and good cause appearing therein, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (doc. 10). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting aside this Court's Orders dismissing this case (docs. 8, 9). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall re-open this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Plaintiff shall separately file the appropriate proof of service. DATED this 10th day of May, 2006. -2Case 2:05-cv-03490-JAT Document 11 Filed 05/10/2006 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?