Spiller et al v. Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, Inc.

Filing 51

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice per parties stipulation 50 . Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 2/6/08. (DMT, )

Download PDF
Spiller et al v. Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, Inc. Doc. 51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Ellen Spiller and John Spiller, wife and) ) husband, ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) ARAMARK LEISURE SERVICES ) GROUP INC., an Arizona corporation; ) ARAMARK SPORTS & ) ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, an ) Arizona corporation; LAKE POWELL ) RESORTS & MARINA, an Arizona ) corporation; JOHN DOE I, an employee of ) Defendants, and JANE DOE I, husband and ) wife; JOHN DOE II, an employee of ) Defendants, and JANE DOE II, husband ) and ) wife; JOHN DOES III-X; JANE DOES III- ) X; BLACK CORPORATIONS I-X; WHITE) PARTNERSHIPS I-X; AND GREEN ) LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES I-X, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ No. CV-06-504-PHX-SMM ORDER Pending before the Court is the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice [Doc. No. 50]. After consideration of the parties' Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice [Doc. No. 50]. This matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with this case. Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions and hearings in this matter are hereby VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over all disputes among the parties arising out of the settlement agreement, including but not limited to interpretation and enforcement of the terms of the settlement agreement. DATED this 6th day of February, 2008. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?