Soilworks LLC v Midwest Industrial Supply Inc
Filing
14
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) by Midwest Industrial Supply Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chen, George)
Soilworks LLC v Midwest Industrial Supply Inc
Doc. 14
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Bryan Cave LLP Two North Central Avenue, Suite 2200 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4406 (602) 364-7000
BRYAN CAVE LLP, 00145700 Lawrence G. Scarborough, 006965 George C. Chen, 019704 Two N. Central Avenue, Suite 2200 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4406 Telephone: (602) 364-7000 Facsimile: (602) 364-7070 Email: lgscarborough@bryancave.com Email: george.chen@bryancave.com Attorneys for Defendant Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Soilworks, LLC, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff, v. Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc., an Ohio corporation authorized to do business in Arizona, Defendant. No. 2:06-CV-02141-DGC STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MIDWEST INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC. TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
573709
Soilworks, LLC ("Soilworks) and Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc. ("MIS"), through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that the time for MIS to answer Soilwork's Complaint be extended to and include March 26, 2007. /// /// ///
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Bryan Cave LLP Two North Central Avenue, Suite 2200 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4406 (602) 364-7000
DATED this 19th day of March 2007.
By /s/ George C. Chen Lawrence G. Scarborough George C. Chen Bryan Cave LLP Two N. Central Avenue, Suite 2200 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4406 Attorneys for Defendant Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc. By s/ E. Scott Dosek with permission E. Scott Dosek Kutak Rock LLP 8601 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 300 Scottsdale, AZ 85253-2742 Attorneys for Plaintiff Soilworks, LLC
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
573709
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?