MDY Industries, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. et al

Filing 78

Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge David G Campbell. Appearances: Joseph Meaney and Lance Venable for pla; Christian Genetski and Shane McGee for dfts. Motion Hearing held on 6/26/2008 re 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by MDY Industries, LLC, Michael Donnelly, and 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Vivendi Games, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. IT IS ORDERED taking the matters under advisement. (Court Reporter Elizabeth Lemke.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LMR, )

MDY Industries, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. et al

Doc. 78

Case 2:06-cv-02555-DGC Document 90

Filed 09/10/08 Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5

Law Offices of MATTHEW C. DAVIDSON, LTD. 1859 N. Grand Ave. Suite 1 Nogales, AZ, 85621 [phone] Matthew C. Davidson, SBN 015021 Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7 8

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
9

Plaintiff,
10

vs.
11

DERVIN HYLTON,
12

Defendant.
13 14

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NO. CR-03-1619-TUC-CKJ(HCE) MOTION TO CONTINUE PLEA, TRIAL AND MOTION DEADLINES
(Pursuant to Rule 1.10(n) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, this is the 1st request for extension)

Excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(F) will occur as a
15

result of this motion or of an order based thereon.
16

The Defendant, DERVIN HYLTON, by and through undersigned counsel
17

hereby moves this Court for an Order continuing the Plea Deadline of
18

February 23, 2007 and Trial Date of March 6, 2007 for sixty (60) days.
19

This continuance is requested for the reason that disclosure in this
20

matter exceeds 1,500 pages not included review of wiretap
21

communications and additional time is required to prepare in this
22

matter.
23 24 25

Brian G. Larson, the Assistant United States Attorney

handling this matter, has no objection. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of February, 2007.

-1Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:06-cv-02555-DGC Document 90

Filed 09/10/08 Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

s/Matthew C. Davidson Matthew C. Davidson, Attorney for Defendant Copy of the foregoing served electronically this 19th day of February, 2007 to; Honorable Cindy K. Jorgenson U.S. District Court Judge Brian G. Larson Assistant United States Attorney

-2-

Case 2:06-cv-02555-DGC Document 90

Filed 09/10/08 Page 3 of 4

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
3 4

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
5

Plaintiff,
6

vs.
7

DERVIN HYLTON,
8

Defendant.
9 10 11 12

) NO. CR-03-1619-TUC-CKJ(HCE) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Re: Continuance of trial. This matter is currently set for trial on March 6, 2007. The

defendant filed a motion to continue and for the reason set forth
13

therein additional time is required to adequately prepare for trial.
14

The Government has no objection.
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the Public and the Defendant in a speedy trial because failure to grant the continuance is likely to result in a miscarriage of. IT IS OREDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The deadline for a plea on this case is__________________. Counsel will not be reminded by the Court of this plea deadline and the deadline will be strictly enforced. THE PLEA MUST BE TAKEN TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE ON OR BEFORE THE PLEA DEADLINE.

-3-

Case 2:06-cv-02555-DGC Document 90

Filed 09/10/08 Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

2.

That this matter is set for trial on__________________at 9:30 a.m. Counsel are to be present at 9:00 a.m.

3. 4.

Motions shall be filed by:______________________. Excludable delay under 18 U.S.C.§3161(h)(8)(A) and 3(B)(4) is found to begin on_______________, 2007 and end on_________________,2007. Such time shall be in addition

to other excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act and shall commence as of the day following the day that would otherwise be the last day for commencement of trial. 5. That any and all subpoenas previously issued shall remain in full force and effect through the new trial date. DATED this______day of _____________, 2007.

_____________________________________ United States District Court Judge

Copy of the following was served electronically this ______ day of _____________, 2007 to: Matthew C. Davidson, Esq. Brian G. Larson Assistant United States Attorney

-4-