Yuma Union High School District v. York International Corporation

Filing 6

ORDER re 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 1-8-07.

Download PDF
Yuma Union High School District v. York International Corporation Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA YUMA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political Subdivision of the State of Arizona, Plaintiff, v. YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, and JOHN DOES I-X, Defendants. No. CV06-3078-PHX-PGR ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENDED TIME TO FILE ANSWER The Court is in receipt of the parties' Stipulation for Extended Time to File Answer (Doc. 5). Although the Court grants the extension, the parties are hereby cautioned that this Court does not entertain stipulations or agreements to extend deadlines, and that any such requests must be brought by formal motion before the Court. The parties are advised that if they believe good cause exists for the extension of any deadline(s) remaining in this action they must brief the issue to the Court including explanations as to why the party is unable to comply with the deadlines imposed. Furthermore, the motion must inform the Court if the proposed extension will affect any other deadlines in the action. Any future motions for extensions which fail to comply with this Order will be denied. IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation for Extended Time to File Answer (Doc. 5) is GRANTED. The Defendants' must file their answer to the Plaintiff's Complaint on January 8, 2007. Case 2:06-cv-03078-PGR Document 6 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED this 8th day of January, 2007. Case 2:06-cv-03078-PGR Document 6 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?