Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 40

ORDER granting 39 Motion to Extend Response and Reply Dates in Connection with Dfts' Motion for Summary Judgment. The last day for Pla to file a response to the motion for summary judgment is extended to 12/15/08. The last day for Dfts to file a reply to the motion for summary judgment is extended to 01/09/09. All other provisions in the Scheduling Order dated 01/08/08 20 shall remain in effect. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 12/12/08.(DNH, )

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA David B. Jones, Plaintiff, v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et. al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-07-0775-PHX-SMM ORDER Before the Court is the parties Joint Motion to Extend Response and Reply Dates in Connection with Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 39). Plaintiff requests an additional eleven (11) days to respond to Defendants' motion for summary judgment because Plaintiff's counsel has a four-day jury trial starting on November 18, 2008. Furthermore, Plaintiff himself will be unavailable during the Thanksgiving holiday. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the parties Joint Motion to Extend Response and Reply Dates in Connection with Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 39). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day for Plaintiff to file a response to the motion for summary judgment is extended to December 15, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day for Defendants to file a reply to the motion for summary judgment is extended to January 9, 2009. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other provisions in the Scheduling Order dated January 8, 2008 (Dkt. 20) shall remain in effect. DATED this 12th day of November, 2008. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?