Landrum v. Schweitzer et al
ORDER FROM CHAMBERS OF THE HONORABLE JOHN W. SEDWICK - This court adopts the 21 Report and Recommendation. Based thereon, the petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 10/22/08. (SAT)
MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA WILLIAM LANDRUM THE HONORABLE JOHN W. SEDWICK PROCEEDINGS: ORDER FROM CHAMBERS v. LAURA SCHWEITZER, et al. CASE NO. 2:07-cv-00952 (JWS) Date: October 22, 2008
At docket 21, Magistrate Judge Voss recommends that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by William Landrum be denied and dismissed with prejudice as untimely. Landrum filed objections at docket 22. In a case of this type, the district court reviews the magistrate judge's recommended conclusions of law and any recommended findings of fact as to which an objection is taken de novo. This court reviews any recommended findings of fact as to which no objection is taken for clear error. This court has applied that standard. There is nothing in the objections which shows any error in the recommendations by Judge Voss. This court adopts the recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law reflected in the report at docket 21. Based thereon, the petition is DENIED and dismissed with prejudice.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?