Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al

Filing 37

ORDER granting 36 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COUNTERCLAIMANTS TO RESPOND TO COUNTERDEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 6/29/2007. (NVW, )

Download PDF
Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 2:07-cv-00954-NVW Document 37 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona corporation, d/b/a "RIPOFFREPORT.COM"; ED MAGEDSON, an individual, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY, an individual; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY d/b/a DEFAMATION ACTION.COM; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY aka JIM RICKSON; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY aka MATT JOHNSON; ROBERT RUSSO, an individual; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a DEFENDMYNAME.COM; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C.; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C.; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C. d/b/a DEFENDMYNAME.COM; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C. d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; DEFAMATION ACTION LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; and INTERNET DEFAMATION LEAGUE, an unincorporated association, Defendants. Case No. CV07-00954 PHX NVW ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT RUSSO, an individual; and QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C., Counterclaimants, v. XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona corporation, d/b/a "RIPOFFREPORT.COM"; ED MAGEDSON, an individual, Counterdefendants. The court having considered the parties Stipulation for Extension of Time for Counterclaimants to Respond to Counterdefendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. # 36), and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY OREDERED that the request is granted and Counterclaimants shall have until July 6, 2007, to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Dated this 29th day of June 2007. Case 2:07-cv-00954-NVW Document 37- 2 -Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?