Quijada v. Schriro

Filing 10

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed as time-barred. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter jgm accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/4/09. (SAT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. Dora Schriro, Respondent. Ray Anthony Quijada, Petitioner, NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV07-1298-PHX-SRB ORDER Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 June 3, 2007, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. On September 12, 2007, Respondent filed her response to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No reply was filed. On April 16, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be dismissed as untimely. In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had 10 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed by Petitioner. The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed as time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 4th day of May, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?