Boland et al v. Apartment Investment and Management Company et al

Filing 64

ORDER granting 61 Motion to Approve Settlement. The Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit 1 to the Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. #61-2) is hereby approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk shall dismiss this case with prejudice within 60 days of the date of this Order, unless either party files a motion for an extension of time to resolve the claims. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 10/16/08.(LSP)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) Apartment Investment and Management) ) Company; et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Kevin Boland; et al., No. CV 07-1370-PHX-JAT ORDER The parties in this case have filed a Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. #61). When employees bring a private action for back wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the employer and employees agree to settle the disputed claims, the court must review and approve the settlement for its fairness to the settling employees. See e.g. Lynn's Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982). The court should determine whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Id. at 1354. Having reviewed the parties' arm's length Settlement Agreement, the Court finds that it is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The settlement fairly compensates the Plaintiffs for their claims and eliminates the ongoing burden, expense, and risk of litigation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the parties' Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. #61). The Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit 1 to the Motion to Approve Settlement (Doc. #61-2) is hereby approved. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case with prejudice within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, unless either party files a motion for an extension of time to resolve the claims. DATED this 16th day of October, 2008. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?