Patterson v. Shaw, et al
ORDER granting 99 Motion for Leave to File; the Clerk shall file 100 Defendants' Lodged Proposed Amended Reply. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/12/09.(LSP)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Barbara Patterson, v. Plaintiff,
Matthew Shaw, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CV 07-1476-PHX-PGR ORDER
Currently before the Court is Defendants'1 Motion for Leave to File Corrected Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #99). Defendants discovered that a version, other than the final, was mistakenly filed in lieu of the final version. Plaintiff's counsel has no objection to the substitution. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING the Motion (doc. #99). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file Defendants' Lodged Proposed Amended Reply (doc. #100). DATED this 12th day of May, 2009.
Defendants Shaw, Lechuga, Carlson, and McClaine.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?