UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Brereton et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting 16 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Andrew Stewart Ashworth added for Plaintiff UBS Financial Services Inc.. Attorneys Patrick Michael Klein, II and William Lee Thorpe terminated as counsel for Plaintiff UBS Financial Services Inc.. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 8/29/07.(SAT)

Download PDF
UBS Financial Services Inc. v. Brereton et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA UBS Financial Services, Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Christopher Brereton, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV 07-1611-PHX-SMM ORDER Pending before the Court is a Motion to Substitute Attorney filed by Andrew S. Ashworth of the law firm of Gabriel & Ashworth, P.L.L.C. (Dkt. 16) Pursuant to Rule 83.3 of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for District of Arizona, Mr. Ashworth requests to be substituted as counsel of record for Plaintiff UBS Financial Services, Inc., in the place and stead of attorneys William L. Thorpe and Patrick M. Klein of the law firm of Fennemore Craig, P.C. Having satisfied the requirements of LRCiv. 83.3 and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the Motion to Substitute Attorney (Dkt. 16). // // // Case 2:07-cv-01611-SMM Document 19 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to substitute Andrew S. Ashworth of the law firm of Gabriel & Ashworth, P.L.L.C., 10105 E. Via Linda, Suite 103, No.392, Scottsdale, AZ 85258, as counsel of record for Plaintiff UBS Financial Services, Inc. ("UBS"), in the place and stead of attorneys William L. Thorpe and Patrick M. Klein of the law firm of Fennemore Craig, P.C. DATED this 29th day of August, 2007. -2Case 2:07-cv-01611-SMM Document 19 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?