Kruska v. Ochoa et al
Filing
149
ORDER denying Plaintiff's #107 Motion to Recover Expenses. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 2/4/09.(REW, )
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PERVERTED JUSTICE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED, et. ) ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) JAN E. KRUSKA,
No. CV 08-0054-PHX-SMM ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Recover Expenses (Doc. 107). Plaintiff requests that she receive reimbursement of $285, which represents the costs for filing a response to Defendants April and David Butler's Motion to Summary Judgment. The legal basis for the expenses sought appears to be "Arizona L.R.Civ.P. Rule 9(A)(2)." However, no such local rule exists in the District of Arizona. Plaintiff also references the rule dealing with substitution of counsel, however, such rule does not provide for the recovery of expenses sought by Plaintiff. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Recover Expenses (Doc. 107). DATED this 4th day of February, 2009.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
