Bond v. Holtzen et al
ORDER granting 204 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/4/10.(REW)
-CRP Bond v. Holtzen et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
United States of America, Plaintiff, vs. Neil Rusty Bond, Defendant/Movant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CR-03-974-PHX-DGC No. CV-08-77-PHX-DGC (CRP) Ninth Circuit No. 10-16891 ORDER
Defendant Neil Bond has filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Doc. 204. Defendant previously was determined to be financially unable to obtain an adequate defense. The Court does not find that the appeal is not taken in good faith or that Defendant is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A); see Doc. 200 at 2. Nor is the Court aware of a statute precluding the extension of forma pauperis status on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(B). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 204) is granted. DATED this 4th day of November, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?