Holmes v. Barker et al
ORDER denying 31 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/25/08.(DNH)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Joseph C. Holmes, Plaintiff, vs. Russell Barker, a Police Officer for the City of Clinton, Tennessee, et al. Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CV-08-190-PHX-DGC ORDER
On September 19, 2008, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. #19. The Court denied Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of that order one month later. Dkt. #30. Plaintiff has filed a new motion for appointment of counsel, arguing that he is in fact able to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits. Dkt. #31. The Court will not revisit the issue of appointment of counsel for a third time. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. #31) is denied. DATED this 25th day of November, 2008.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?