Martin, et al v. T L Dallas, Ltd. et al
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that, by 1/6/09, Plas shall file with this Court a showing of cause as to why the Dfts' 26] Motion to Dismiss Plas' Second Amended Complaint should not be granted pursuant to Rule7.2(i) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If Plas fail to show cause, the motion will be granted pursuant to that rule, which will result in the termination of Plas' case. Show Cause Response due by 1/6/2009. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/31/08. (SAT)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
PATRICIA MARTIN, individually and on) behalf of the ESTATE OF VINCENT) ) MARTIN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ) T.L. DALLAS, LTD, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
No. CV 08-00546-PHX-GMS ORDER
The Court has received Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. # 26.) That motion, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, was filed on November 13, 2008, along with notice of the motion and proof of service. (Id.) Plaintiffs have not responded to the motion, and any such response would now be over a month late. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, by January 6, 2009, Plaintiffs shall file with this Court a showing of cause as to why the motion should not be granted pursuant to Rule 7.2(i) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. If Plaintiffs fail to show cause, the motion will be granted pursuant to that rule, which will result in the termination of Plaintiffs' case. DATED this 31st day of December, 2008.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?