Saunders v. Astrue

Filing 54

AMENDED ORDER granting 53 Plaintiff's counsel's Motion to Modify Court Order. The Court's order 52 is modified to reflect attorneys' fees in the amount of $26,908.00. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/24/12.(TLJ)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Marvin A. Saunders, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 No. CV08-0595-PHX-DGC AMENDED ORDER v. Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Plaintiff’s attorney has filed a motion to modify court order dated May 1, 2012 16 17 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 60(b). Doc. 53. The Court will grant the motion. 18 I. Background. 19 On March 27, 2008, Plaintiff filed a request for judicial review of Defendant’s 20 finding that Plaintiff was not disabled under the Social Security Act and was not entitled 21 to Disability Insurance Benefits. Doc. 1. On September 16, 2009, the Court affirmed 22 Defendant’s decision. Doc. 20. Plaintiff appealed to the Ninth Circuit, and on May 12, 23 2011, the Ninth Circuit remanded the matter to this Court for further proceedings. 24 Doc. 31-1. On August 25, 2011, the Court remanded the matter to Defendant for an 25 award of benefits. Doc. 38. Plaintiff’s attorney filed a motion for an award of attorneys’ 26 fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Doc. 49. The Court entered an order (Doc. 52) 27 granting the attorneys’ fees. Plaintiff’s attorney then filed a motion to modify court order 28 dated May 1, 2012 pursuant to Fed. R. .Civ. P. 60(b). Doc. 53. Counsel for Defendant 1 have indicated to the Court that they do not oppose the motion. 2 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to modify Court order 3 (Doc. 53) is granted. The Court’s order (Doc. 52) is modified to reflect attorneys’ fees 4 in the amount of $26,908.00. 5 Dated this 24th day of May, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?