Federal Trade Commission, v. Handicapped & Disabled Workshops, Inc., et al.,

Filing 66

ORDER. Status Report due by 9/25/2009. Receiver's request for a ruling on his fee application 61 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/22/2009. (NVO)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Handicapped & Disabled Workshops, ) Inc., also formerly known as Handi-Tech ) Company; Handi-Hope Industries, Inc.; ) ) Handi-Ship, LLC; Bruce D. Peeples; ) George Thomas; and Joshua D. ) Abramson, ) ) Defendants. ) Federal Trade Commission, No. CV-08-908-PHX-DGC ORDER Pursuant to the Court's July 6, 2009 order (Dkt. #63), the Receiver has filed a first status report (Dkt. #64). The report indicates that the Receiver mailed notices to potential creditors of Corporate Defendants on July 17, 2009. Dkt. #64 at 3, Ex. A. The Receiver requests that the Court allow him 60 days to file a second report apprising the Court of the status of any claims made by creditors. The Court will grant this request. The Court will deny the Receiver's request that his fee application filed on June 18, 2009 (Dkt. #61) be granted because a decision on that application cannot be made until the creditors' time for filing objections has passed. See Dkt. #63 at 3. The Receiver may file a supplemental fee application upon the filing of the second status report. The Court will then issue a ruling on both fee applications. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Receiver shall file a second status report by September 25, 2009. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The Receiver's request for a ruling on his fee application (Dkt. #61) is denied without prejudice. 3. The Receiver may file a supplemental fee application upon the filing of the second status report. DATED this 22nd day of July, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?