Strojnik v. Costar Realty Information, Inc. et al

Filing 98

Download PDF
Strojnik v. Costar Realty Information, Inc. et al Doc. 98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Soilworks, LLC, an Arizona corporation, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterdefendant/ ) ) Counterclaimant, ) ) vs. ) Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc., an Ohio ) corporation authorized to do business in ) ) Arizona, ) Defendant/Counterclaimant/ ) ) Counterdefendant. ) ) No. CV-06-2141-PHX-DGC ORDER On August 7, 2008, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the parties' motions for summary judgment. Dkt. #94; see Dkt. ##78-79. Midwest has filed a motion for clarification of that order. Dkt. #97. In summarizing its rulings, the Court stated that "[s]ummary judgment is denied with respect to Midwest's claims for a declaratory judgment that Soilworks infringes the `266 and `270 Patents." Dkt. #94 at 24-25, 1(h). Midwest seeks clarification that "it is Soilworks' summary judgment motion that is denied" with respect to Midwest's claims for infringement. Dkt. #97 at 3-4 (emphasis in original). As Midwest correctly notes in its motion, it did not seek summary judgment on its infringement claims. Id. at 3 (citing Dkt. #78 at 3 n.1). Midwest is therefore correct in concluding that when the Court denied summary judgment with respect to Midwest's Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 infringement claims, it was denying Soilworks' request for summary judgment. See Dkt. #94 at 22-23. IT IS ORDERED: 1. 2. Midwest's motion for clarification (Dkt. #97) is granted. In its August 7, 2008 order, the Court denied Soilworks' summary judgment motion with respect to Midwest's claims for a declaratory judgment of infringement. DATED this 5th day of September, 2008. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?