Singh v. Kane et al

Filing 15

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED DENYING the 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus as moot. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 12/19/08. (SAT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Harbinder Singh, Petitioner, vs. Katrina S. Kane, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV-08-01370-PHX-FJM ORDER The court has before it petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (doc. 1), respondents' response and notice of status report (docs. 9 & 12), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. 13), and petitioner's objection (doc. 14). Following our de novo review, we "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Petitioner challenged his detention pending his removal to India and sought release from custody. However, he advises us that on November 18, 2008, he was released from custody and removed to India. The Report and Recommendation recommends a denial and dismissal with prejudice. Petitioner, having been removed after the Report and Recommendation, objects and suggests a dismissal on grounds of mootness. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1). IT IS ORDERED DENYING the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as moot (doc. DATED this 19th day of December, 2008. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?