Sonic Supply, LLC v. Universal White Cement Company, Inc.

Filing 74

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Doc.# 73 . FURTHER ORDERED a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference will be set with an Order to follow. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 08/10/09. (KMG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On July 20, 2009, Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the parties be calendared for a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference (Doc. 73). Both parties failed to file timely objections. The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). It is "clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, `but not otherwise.'"). District courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Universal White Cement Company, Inc., ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) Sonic Supply, LLC No. CV-08-1605-PHX-ROS ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 73) is ADOPTED. FURTHER ORDERED a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference will be set with an Order to follow. DATED this 10th day of August, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?