Roque v. Schriro et al
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED DENYING Petitioner Roque's 48 Emergency Notice ofObjection to Magistrate Judge Aspey's Ruling and Notice of MOTION (Request) to Replace Magistrate Judge Aspey. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 12/15/09.(SAT)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Frank S. Roque, v. Petitioner,
Charles L. Ryan, et. al., Respondents.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 08-CV-2154-PHX-PGR (MEA)
Currently before the Court is Petitioner Roque's Emergency Notice of Objection to Magistrate Judge Aspey's Ruling and Notice of Request to Replace Magistrate Judge Aspey. (Doc. 48.) In the event that a petitioner does not agree with the decision of the Court, replacement of the Judge is not the proper method with which to proceed. Rather, the petitioner may file a notice of objection stating the basis for petitioner's objection and supporting legal authority for said objections. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING Petitioner Roque's Emergency Notice of Objection to Magistrate Judge Aspey's Ruling and Notice of Request to Replace Magistrate Judge Aspey. (Doc. 48.) DATED this 15th day of December, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?