Ogden v. CDI Corporation

Filing 176

ORDER denying 175 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff shall file no further motions in this case.. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/8/2013.(TCA)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 10 Martin Ogden, No. CV08-02180-PHX-DGC Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 ORDER CDI Corporation, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff has a filed a motion to reconsider the Court’s recent award of attorneys’ 17 fees to Defendant. Doc. 175. The Court’s award was based on Defendant having been 18 granted summary judgment on Plaintiff’s second claim for relief. Doc. 174. As a basis 19 for reconsidering the fee award, Plaintiff argues that the Court’s summary judgment 20 ruling, entered on June 30, 2010 (Doc. 84), was incorrect. Doc. 175. 21 This is not the time for Plaintiff to attack an award of summary judgment granted 22 more than two years ago. This case has been resolved through summary judgment and 23 trial, and has been affirmed on appeal. Plaintiff has filed numerous motions seeking 24 relief from the outcome of this case, none of which has been successful. Docs. 132, 133, 25 139, 140, 142, 143, 144, and 161. The case has been concluded and attorneys’ fees have 26 been awarded appropriately. 27 28 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 175) is denied. Plaintiff shall file no further motions in this case. 1 Dated this 8th day of April, 2013. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?