Osborn v. Bartos, et al.,

Filing 200

ORDER - the Report and Recommendation is (Doc. 143) IS ADOPTED and Defendant Marten IS DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/8/10. (KMG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 full. vs. Ivan Bartos, et al., Defendants. Kevin A. Osborn, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-08-02193-PHX-ROS (JRI) ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin's Report and Recommendation, which was filed on April 28, 2010. (Doc. 143) Magistrate Judge Irwin recommends Defendant Marten be dismissed for failure to effect service. A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 USC 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.") (internal quotations and citations omitted). No objections being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation is (Doc. 143) IS ADOPTED and Defendant Marten IS DISMISSED. DATED this 8th day of September, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?