Osborn v. Bartos, et al.,

Filing 281

ORDER the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 280 ) is ADOPTED. IT IS ORDERED Defendants Unknown Parties (John Does and Jane Does) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 2/3/2012. (KMG)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Kevin A. Osborn,
Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12
Ivan Bartos, et. al.,
13
Defendants.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV-08-2193-PHX-ROS (JRI)
ORDER

15
16
17

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”). (Doc. 280).

18

A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

19

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has

20

filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district

21

court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. Reyna-

22

Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219,

23

1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of

24

factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”) (internal

25

quotations and citations omitted).

26
27
28

The R&R was issued January 12, 2012. No objections being made, the Court will
adopt the Report and Recommendation in full.
Accordingly,

1

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 280) is ADOPTED.

2

IT IS ORDERED Defendants Unknown Parties (John Does and Jane Does) are

3

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

4
5

DATED this 3rd day of February, 2012.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-