Cygnus Systems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
C y g n u s Systems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
D o c . 489
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
D A N I E L G. KNAUSS U n ite d States Attorney D is tr ic t of Arizona T I M O T H Y F. ANDREW S A s s is ta n t United States Attorney 4 0 3 5 South Avenue A Y u m a ,, Arizona 85365 A r iz o n a State Bar No. 021658 T e le p h o n e (928) 344-1087 tim .a nd r e w s @ u s d o j .g o v
U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT D IS T R IC T OF ARIZONA U n ite d States of America, C R -0 6 -3 8 8 -P H X -R O S P l a in tif f , v. A le ja n d ro Ruiz-Ibarra, D e f e n d a n t. T h e United States of America, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby submits this re sp o n s e to defense counsel's third motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Defense counsel h a s moved to withdraw because of an apparent communication breakdown with her client. The g o v e rn m e n t opposes the motion. A defendant in a criminal prosecution has the right to a speedy and public trial. 6 th A m e n d m e n d . This fundamental right, however, exists not only for the defendant but also for the p u b lic, whose speedy trial right "exists separate from, and at times in opposition to, the interests o f the accused." U.S. v. Tanh Huu Lam, 251 F.3d 852, 855 (9 th Cir. 2001)(citing Barker v. W in g o , 407 U.S. 514, 519 (1972)). When Congress designed the Speedy Trial Act, it did so "in p a rt to protect the public's interest in the speedy administration of justice." U.S. v. Hall, 181 F .3 d 1057, 1062 (9 th Cir. 1999). "Accordingly, regardless of the willingness of counsel to accept p re trial delay, the Speedy Trial Act assigns district courts an independent responsibility to p ro te c t both the defendant's and the public's strong interest in the timely administration of ju s tic e ." U.S. v. Messer, 197 F.3d 330, 337 (9 th Cir. 1999). W h ile the government is mindful of the fact that defense counsel is experiencing d if f ic u lty as of late in communicating with her client, and that she has not been paid the balance G O V E R N M E N T 'S RESPONSE TO D E F E N S E COUNSEL'S THIRD M O T IO N TO WITHDRAW AS C O U N S E L OF RECORD
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
o f her fee, the government respectfully asserts the public's interest in the timely disposition of th is case under the Speedy Trial Act. The defendant has been in pre-trial custody for more than 1 4 months, and the government is of the opinion that the interest of the public in resolving this c a se outweighs the interest the defendant may have in continuing it for the purpose of receiving a new attorney. Respectfully submitted this 8th day of June 2007. D A N IE L G. KNAUSS U n ite d States Attorney D is tric t of Arizona s/ Timothy F. Andrews TIMOTHY F. ANDREWS A s s is ta n t United States Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on June 8, 2007, I transmitted the attached document to the clerk's o f f ic e using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the f o l lo w in g CM/ECF registrants: E rin M. Alavez A tto rn e y for Defendant b y: s/ Timothy F. Andrews T im o t h y F. Andrews
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?