Cygnus Systems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al

Filing 66

Download PDF
Cygnus Systems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al Doc. 66 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 Upon motion of the defendant, with no opposition from the government, and good IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis Armando Higuera-Llamas, Defendant. No. CR07-00045-PHX-JAT ORDER (First Request) 16 cause appearing, to wit: additional time needed for investigation and trial preparation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendant's Motion to Continue trial and 18 Motion to Extend Deadline for Filing Pretrial Motions. This court specifically finds that the 19 ends of justice served by taking this action outweigh the best interest of the public and the 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 defendant in a speedy trial. This finding is based on the court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a continuance would unreasonably deny the attorney for defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). IT IS ORDERED continuing trial from March 6, 2007 to Tuesday, April 3, 2007 26 at 9:00 a.m. in Phoenix, Arizona. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the current pretrial motions to and including 28 February 27, 2007. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the status conference set for February 21, 2 2007 at 4:15 p.m. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any subpoenas previously issued and served in 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 this matter remain in effect and are answerable at the new trial date and the party who served the subpoena should advise the witnesses of the new trial date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under Title 18 U.S.C. 3161(h) will commence on 3/7/07 through 4/3/07, for a total of 27 days. DATED this 16th day of February, 2007.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?