Motion Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc.

Filing 440

Motion Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc.

Doc. 440

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Tempe City Attorney's Office 21 East Sixth Street, Suite 201 P.O. Box 5002 Tempe, Arizona 85280

TEMPE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ANDREW B. CHING, #016144 CATHERINE M. BOWMAN, #011713 CLARENCE E. MATHERSON, JR., #021211 21 E. Sixth Street, Suite 201 P.O. Box 5002 Tempe, Arizona 85280 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Candace Nored, a single woman, and Justin Nored, a minor child, by and through his natural parent, Candace Nored, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF TEMPE, a body politic; Andrew Mazoff and Jane Doe Mazoff, husband and wife; JOHN DOES I-X; JANE DOES I-X; BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X; AND XYZ ENTITIES I-X, Defendants. Defendants City of Tempe and Andrew Mazoff, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby move the Court for its Order granting them leave to exceed the page limitations provided in Arizona Local Rule of Court 7.2 by seven pages in filing their Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs exceeds 40 pages. The Response filed by No. CIV-08-0008-PHX-MEA MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS BY DEFENDANTS CITY OF TEMPE AND ANDREW MAZOFF

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The additional pages are necessary for Defendants to

adequately reply. Defendants also incorporate by reference Document No. 85, which explains the complexities in this case that justify the additional pages. Defendants are filing with the Court, contemporaneously with this Motion, their Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Reply is currently eighteen (18) pages long. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(e), unless otherwise permitted by

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Tempe City Attorney's Office 21 East Sixth Street, Suite 201 P.O. Box 5002 Tempe, Arizona 85280

the Court, a reply including its supporting memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages in length. Defendants are aware of Rule 7.2(e) and have attempted to comply with it in preparing their Reply. Therefore, Defendants respectfully request leave of Court to exceed the page limits by seven pages, which is inclusive of the certificate of mailing. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 21st day of September, 2009. TEMPE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE s/ Catherine M. Bowman Andrew B. Ching Catherine M. Bowman Clarence E. Matherson, Jr. 21 E. Sixth Street, Suite 201 P.O. Box 5002 Tempe, Arizona 85280 Attorneys for Defendants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 21, 2009, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: Margaret F. Dean CAMPBELL, YOST, CLARE & NORELL, P.C. 101 N. First Avenue, Suite 2500 Phoenix, AZ 85003 Mark A. Fredenberg FREDENBERG & GULLETTE 714 E. Rose Lane, Suite 200 Phoenix, AZ 85014 Attorneys for Plaintiff I further certify that on September 21, 2009, the attached document was handdelivered to: HONORABLE MARK E. ASPEY United States District Court Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse 401 W. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85003 s/ Cindy Clore 2

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28