Motion Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc.
M o t i o n Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc.
1 2 3 4 5 6
1LERMA & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Jose M. Lerma, Esq. 33 N. Tucson Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85716 Phone: (520) 624-2179 Fax: (520) 624-3332 Computer No. 65449 State Bar No. 003020 Attorney for Defendant Isac Alcaraz-Torres I N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 F O R THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 I sa c Alcaraz-Torres, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. U n d e rs ig n e d Counsel apologizes to the Court, Mr. Logalbo and the Probation Office if these objections be deemed untimely, but there was a death in Counsel's family, w h ic h took much of his time over the last two weeks and the objectionable sections o f the Presentence Report, as hereinafter alleged, did not come to his attention until S ep tem b er 11, 2008 when Counsel reviewed the Presentence Report with Mr. A lc a r a z -T o r re s . IS A C ALCARAZ-TORRES, Defendant in the above matter, through Counsel undersigned, o b je c ts to the following paragraphs and sections of the Presentence Report heretofore filed herein, a n d alleges and moves the Court as follows: It is expected that excludable delay under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161 (h )(1 )(8 )(B )(I) and (iv) will occur as a result of this motion or an order based thereon. vs. United States of America, C a s e No. CR-08-00453 FRZ-JJM Plaintiff, O B J E C T IO N S TO PRESENTENCE REPORT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
P a ra g ra p h 21 of the Presentence Report imputes to Defendant one (1) Criminal H is to ry Point for simultaneous misdemeanor convictions dating to July 20, 1995 ( T h re a te n in g and Intimidating and Failure to Appear). The authority cited by the P ro b atio n Officer for this Criminal Point computation is U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.1 (c).
P a ra g ra p h 23 of the PSR includes the aforesaid one (1) Criminal Point in reaching a s u b - to t a l of four (4) Criminal History Points.
Paragraph 25 imputes to the Defendant an additional two (2) points for committing th e instant offense while under a Criminal Justice sentence (supervised release) and o n e (1) more point for committing the instant offense less then two (2) years f o llo w in g release from imprisonment.
P ara g rap h 27 of the PSR then totals Defendant's Criminal History points at seven (7), p la c in g the Defendant in Criminal History Category IV (7, 8, 9 points) under the G u i d e lin e s .
It is, however, Defendant's position that the one(1) Criminal History Point imputed to him in Paragraph 21 of the PSR should not be counted because this point c o rre sp o n d s to a conviction dating from July 20, 1995, which is more than ten (10) ye a rs from the date of the commission of the instant offense, and the sentence im p o s e d was one of six (6) months summary probation and SEVEN HUNDRED ( $ 7 0 0 .0 0 ) DOLLARS in fines and surcharges.
U .S .S .G . Sec. 4 A1.2(e)(2), in discussing applicable time periods for counting s e n te n c es which were less than one (1) year and one (l) month states specifically that
Page 2 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10. 9. 8.
" ...a n y other prior sentence that was imposed within ten years of the commencement (s ic ) of the instant offense is counted" (emphasis added). Obviously, the July 20, 1995 o ff en se described in Paragraph 21 of the PSR in the instant matter was imposed more th a n ten (10) years (almost 13) after the "commission" of the instant offense, March 1 1 , 2008, and should not be counted.
If the aforesaid one (1) Criminal Point may not be counted against the Defendant in h is Criminal History computations for the reasons stated, then his total Criminal H is to ry points would be six (6), placing him in Criminal history Category III instead o f Criminal History Category IV as set forth in the PSR.
U n d er Defendant's plea agreement, the corresponding sentencing range for a C a teg o ry III Criminal History III is 37-51 months and not the 46-63 months set forth in the PSR which would correspond to a Criminal History IV.
A c c o rd in g ly, the recommendation of the Probation Officer of a sentence of 55 months is inappropriate because it is based on erroneous information.
It is, therefore, respectfully requested that the Court order appropriate changes and m o d if ic a tio n s be made to the Presentence Report so as to reflect Defendant's accurate Criminal H is to ry, the appropriate corresponding plea agreement range of sentence, and a recommendation c o n s is te n t with this set of circumstances.
D A T E D this 12th day of September, 2008.
Page 3 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 R eg in a ld Gaddis, A.P.O. F e d e ra l Probation Office C o p y mailed this 12 t h of September, 2008 to: Is a c Alcaraz-Torres I hereby certify that on September 12, 2008, I electronically transmitted the attached d o cu m e n t to the Clerk's Office using the C M /E C F system for filing. B y : s/Jose M. Lerma E C F Copy and Fax to: Michael D. Logalbo. AUSA U . S. Attorney's Office
s / Josť M. Lerma Josť M. Lerma A tto rn e y for Defendant Alcaraz-Torres
Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?