Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Jones et al

Filing 46

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT that Nationwide is not obligated to defend or indemnify Defendant Jane Jones against the claims alleged in the Arizona Superior Court, Maricopa County, Case No CV 2008-025987, by Defendant Kathleen Knapp. ORDER that Nationwide is not obligated to defend or indemnify Defendant Jane Jones against the claims alleged in the Arizona Superior Court, Maricopa County, Case No. CV 2008-093072, by Defendant Jessica Roberts. ORDER that Nationwide's claim for attorney fees against Defendants is denied Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 2/22/10. (TLJ)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Nationwide Company,

Mutual

Fire

Plaintiff, vs. Jane Jones et al., Defendants.

Insurance) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CV 09-291-PHX-NVW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

The Court having entered its order this day granting Plaintiff Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company's (Nationwide) Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #26) and denying Defendant Kathleen Knapp's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #33), IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Nationwide is not obligated to defend or indemnify Defendant Jane Jones against the claims alleged in the Arizona Superior Court, Maricopa County, Case No. CV 2008-025987, by Defendant Kathleen Knapp. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Nationwide is not obligated to defend or indemnify Defendant Jane Jones against the claims alleged in the Arizona Superior Court, Maricopa County, Case No. CV 2008-093072, by Defendant Jessica Roberts.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Nationwide's claim for attorney fees against Defendants is denied. DATED this 22nd day of February, 2010.

-2-