DIRECTV, Inc. v. Eagle West Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 185

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 182 . Defendants' Objection to the Writ of Garnishment is Overruled. Plaintiff's 157 Motion for Judgment against the Garnishee is Granted. That within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall submit a proposed Judgment against Garnishee. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 1/23/13. (DMT)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

DIRECTV, Inc., a California corporation,
Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor,

10
11

ORDER

v.

12

No. CV-09-00379-PHX-JAT

Eagle West Communications, Inc., d/b/a
Eagle West Cable, a Nevada corporation, et
al.,

13
14

Defendant/Judgment Debtor.

15

__________________________________

16

Francisco and Marla Delores Saldana,

17

Garnishee.

18

On December 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and

19

Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 182) recommending that Defendants’ Objection to the

20

Writ of Garnishment be overruled and Plaintiff’s Application for Judgment against the

21

Garnishee (Doc. 157) be granted.

22

Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby

23

accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district

24

courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the

25

subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

26

1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review

27

the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but

28

not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d

1

1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 20
(
003).

2

Accordingly,

3

S
ED
e
eport and R
Recommend
dation (Doc
c.
IT IS ORDERE that the Magistrate Judge’s Re

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

pted.
182) is accep
IT IS FURTH
HER ORD
DERED tha Defenda
at
ants’ Objec
ction to th Writ of
he
Garnishment is overrule
G
ed.
S
ER
RED that P
Plaintiff’s A
Application for Judgm
n
ment agains
st
IT IS FURTHE ORDER
he
ee
ed.
th Garnishe (Doc. 157) is grante
IT IS FURTHE ORDE
S
ER
ERED that, within sev (7) da of the d
,
ven
ays
date of this
Order, Plaintiff shall su
O
ubmit a prop
posed judgm agains Garnishee
ment
st
e.
d
d
uary, 2013.
Dated this 23rd day of Janu

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-