DIRECTV, Inc. v. Eagle West Communications, Inc. et al
Filing
185
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 182 . Defendants' Objection to the Writ of Garnishment is Overruled. Plaintiff's 157 Motion for Judgment against the Garnishee is Granted. That within seven days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall submit a proposed Judgment against Garnishee. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 1/23/13. (DMT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
DIRECTV, Inc., a California corporation,
Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-09-00379-PHX-JAT
Eagle West Communications, Inc., d/b/a
Eagle West Cable, a Nevada corporation, et
al.,
13
14
Defendant/Judgment Debtor.
15
__________________________________
16
Francisco and Marla Delores Saldana,
17
Garnishee.
18
On December 17, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
19
Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 182) recommending that Defendants’ Objection to the
20
Writ of Garnishment be overruled and Plaintiff’s Application for Judgment against the
21
Garnishee (Doc. 157) be granted.
22
Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby
23
accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district
24
courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the
25
subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,
26
1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review
27
the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but
28
not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d
1
1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 20
(
003).
2
Accordingly,
3
S
ED
e
eport and R
Recommend
dation (Doc
c.
IT IS ORDERE that the Magistrate Judge’s Re
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
pted.
182) is accep
IT IS FURTH
HER ORD
DERED tha Defenda
at
ants’ Objec
ction to th Writ of
he
Garnishment is overrule
G
ed.
S
ER
RED that P
Plaintiff’s A
Application for Judgm
n
ment agains
st
IT IS FURTHE ORDER
he
ee
ed.
th Garnishe (Doc. 157) is grante
IT IS FURTHE ORDE
S
ER
ERED that, within sev (7) da of the d
,
ven
ays
date of this
Order, Plaintiff shall su
O
ubmit a prop
posed judgm agains Garnishee
ment
st
e.
d
d
uary, 2013.
Dated this 23rd day of Janu
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?