Rodriguez v. Schriro et al
ORDER denying 14 Respondents' Motion to Strike. Respondents are, however, granted a 10 day extension of time to file an Answer to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents shall file an Answer no later than 6/29/09. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 6/3/09.(TLJ)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Juan Gabriel Rodriguez, Petitioner, vs. Dora Schriro, et al., Respondents.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIV 09-466-PHX-JAT (MHB) ORDER
Pending before the Court is Respondents' Motion to Strike Petitioner's Supplemental Legal Authority (Doc. #14). Respondents claim that "Petitioner filed [ ] Supplemental Legal Authority, which appears to raise additional claims not included in the petition." (Emphasis added.) In their Motion to Strike, Respondents fail to cite any examples. The Court, having reviewed the pleadings, IT IS ORDERED that Respondents' Motion to Strike (Doc. #14) is DENIED. Respondents are, however, granted a 10-day extension of time to file an Answer to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents shall file an Answer no later than June 29, 2009. DATED this 3rd day of June, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?