Williams v. Arizona, State of, et al

Filing 80

ORDER denying plaintiff's 79 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 09/14/10.(ESL)

Download PDF
Williams v. Arizona, State of, et al Doc. 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prentice Williams, Plaintiff, vs. State of Arizona, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-09-711-PHX-FJM ORDER The court has before it plaintiff's "Motion for Leave of the Court for an Extension to Move for Relief from Order Dated 8/13/2010" (doc. 79). We have previously entered judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff (doc. 75). Defendant now seeks extended time to seek relief from our order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (doc. 74). However, we have already entered final judgment, and plaintiff gives no indication of what relief he plans to seek from this court. Thus, we cannot know what deadline plaintiff wishes to extend. For example, Rule 6(b)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P. prohibits extensions of time to act under Rule 59(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (doc. 79). DATED this 14th day of September, 2010. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?