Keiper v. Washington State Trial Judges et al

Filing 9

ORDER denying 6 Plaintiff's post-judgment Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 8 Plaintiff's Motion for copies of this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/8/12.(DMT)

Download PDF
1 SC 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Owen Walter Keiper, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 Washington State Trial Judges, et al., Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 09-1019-PHX-DGC (MEA) ORDER 14 On May 11, 2009, Plaintiff Owen Walter Keiper, an Alaskan inmate then-confined 15 in the Red Rock Correctional Center, a Corrections Corporation of America facility in Eloy, 16 Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with 60 pages of 17 exhibits.1 (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed a motion for emergency consideration. (Doc. 3.) In 18 an Order filed on May 28, 2009, the Court denied the motion for emergency consideration 19 and dismissed this action without prejudice pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 20 489 (1994). (Doc. 4.) Judgment was entered the same day. (Doc. 5.) Court records reflect 21 that copies of the May 28, 2009 Order and Judgment were mailed to Plaintiff at his address 22 of record and were not returned. 23 On April 2, 2012, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed Without Payment of Fees 24 and Affidavit and a motion requesting copies of filings in this matter. (Doc. 6 & 8.) The 25 Court will deny both motions. 26 27 1 28 Plaintiff indicates that he is now confined in the Anchorage Correctional Complex West in Anchorage, Alaska. (Doc. 8.) 1 Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application will be denied because this action has been 2 closed for nearly three years. Plaintiff’s motion for copies will be denied because an inmate 3 has no right to free copies of pleadings. See In Re Richard, 914 F.2d 1526, 1527 (6th Cir. 4 1990) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915 “does not give a litigant a right to have documents 5 copied and returned to him at government expense”); Robinson v. Miscellaneous, No. 6 09C0148, 2009 WL 1649697, at *4 (E.D. Wis. June 11, 2009); Joseph v. Director of Circle 7 K Corp., No. CV97-2214-PHX-RCB, 2008 WL 4838712, at *1 (D. Ariz. Nov. 5, 2008). 8 Further, the Ninth Circuit has rejected any constitutional right to unlimited free 9 photocopying. See Johnson v. Moore, 926 F.2d 921, 923 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam), 10 superceded on other grounds, 948 F.2d 517 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam); and Sands v. Lewis, 11 886 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1989) (rejecting any constitutional right to free and unlimited 12 photocopying) (citing Jones v. Franzen, 697 F.2d 801, 803 (7th Cir. 1983) (“[B]road as the 13 constitutional concept of liberty is, it does not include the right to xerox.”)). 14 “The Supreme Court has declared that ‘the expenditure of public funds [on behalf of 15 an indigent litigant] is proper only when authorized by Congress . . . .’” Tedder v. Odel, 890 16 F.2d 210, 211-12 (9th Cir. 1989) (quoting United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 321 17 (1976)). The in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, authorizes the Court to pay for 18 service of process on behalf of an indigent litigant and, in certain cases, to pay the costs of 19 printing the record on appeal and preparing a transcript of proceedings, but the statute does 20 not authorize the Court to pay the costs for an indigent litigant’s general copy requests. Cf. 21 Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 1993) (section 1915 does not authorize the district 22 courts to waive payment of fees or expenses for witnesses); Tedder, 890 F.2d at 211-12 23 (same). 24 The Clerk of Court charges 50 cents per page for reproducing any record or paper. 25 See Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees ¶ 4, foll. 28 U.S.C. § 1914. Plaintiff may obtain 26 copies of documents filed in this case by submitting a written request accompanied by 27 payment of the 50 cents per page copy fee. 28 -2- 1 IT IS ORDERED: 2 (1) Plaintiff’s post-judgment in forma pauperis application is denied. (Doc. 6.) 3 (2) Plaintiff’s motion for copies of this action is denied. (Doc. 8.) 4 DATED this 8th day of May, 2012. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?