McCreary v. United States of America
ORDER denying 22 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration. No further filings will be accepted in this closed case. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 1/29/13.(DMT)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Derrick L. McCreary,
United States of America,
We now have before us petitioner’s second motion for reconsideration pursuant to
Rule 60(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. (doc. 22). On December 29, 2009, we issued an order accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation that we deny petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside,
or correct the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 14). On May 16, 2011, we denied
petitioner’s first motion for reconsideration, concluding that petitioner had only repeated
arguments that we had previously considered and rejected (doc. 21).
Once again petitioner asserts a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for counsel’s
failure to object to the sufficiency of the underlying indictment with respect to count 5. This
argument has been considered and rejected twice by this court. See docs. 14 and 21.
Petitioner has failed to satisfy the requisite showing for Rule 60(b) relief from judgment.
IT IS ORDERED DENYING petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (doc. 22). No
further filings will be accepted in this closed case.
DATED this 29th day of January, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?