Giorgis et al v. Ogden et al
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 44 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 11/24/09.(REW, )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Araya Wolde Giorgis, et al., vs. Plaintiffs,
John C. Ogden, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CV-09-1174-PHX-FJM ORDER
We now have before us plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration (doc. 44). On October 26, 2009, we dismissed all claims against all defendants except a state law negligence claim that was remanded to state court. In that order we concluded that plaintiffs' dismissed claims are wholly frivolous. We reaffirm that conclusion. Plaintiffs have failed to meet the showing required by LRCiv 7.2(g), and therefore the motion for reconsideration is denied. IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration (doc. 44). We again urge plaintiffs to seek the advice of counsel. If they do not have one, they may wish to contact the Lawyer Referral Service of the Maricopa County Bar Association at 602-257-4434. DATED this 24th day of November, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?