ORDER granting 5 Motion preservation of documents; granting 10 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/26/2009.(NVO)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) David Porter and Susan Porter, husband ) and wife; Rodd Jose and Barbara Jose, ) ) husband and wife; and Sunline Contracting, L.L.C., an Arizona limited ) ) liability company. ) ) Defendants. ) Highway Technologies, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation,
No. CV-09-1305-PHX-DGC ORDER
On June 26, 2009, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order and setting a preliminary injunction hearing for July 16, 2009. Dkt. #29. Plaintiff has filed a motion for an order directing the preservation of documents and things (Dkt. #5) and a motion for expedited discovery (Dkt. #10). The Court finds good cause to grant the motions. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an order directing the preservation of documents and things (Dkt. #5) is granted. Defendants, and all other parties acting in concert with Defendants, shall preserve and maintain in their present state all documents, electronic data, and other evidence in their possession or control which relate to the subject matter of Plaintiff's verified complaint (Dkt. #1)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2.
pending termination of this case or until further order of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery (Dkt. #10) is granted. Each side may submit up to five requests for production and up to five interrogatories. Responses shall be due within five business days of service and shall be handdelivered to the other side. Each side may take three depositions on three business days' notice. DATED this 26th day of June, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?