Griffin v. Arpaio
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Aspey's 8 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by the Court. FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Pla's failure to serve the Dft in this matter and Pla's failure to comply with the Courts order of 8/11/09. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 12/15/09. (SAT)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Darin Wayne Griffin, v. Plaintiff,
Joseph Arpaio, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CV 09-1418-PHX-PGR (MEA) ORDER
The Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Aspey and no party having filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Aspey's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to serve1 the Defendant in this matter and Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's order of August 11, 2009.2 DATED this 15th day of December, 2009.
Plaintiff was provided with written warning that his failure to acquire a waiver of service from Defendant or to complete service of process on Defendant within 120 days of the date the complaint was filed, by November 3, 2009, would result in the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) and LRCiv. 16.2(b)(2)(B).
Plaintiff further failed to respond to a November 4, 2009 Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to serve and failure to comply with the Court's previous order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?