Torres v. Phoenix, City of et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS ORDERED the 16 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. The Clerk shall close this case. Signed by Judge Roslyn O Silver on 8/30/10. (SAT)

Download PDF
Torres v. Phoenix, City of et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On July 13, 2010, Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that this case be dismissed. Plaintiff did not file any objections. A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 USC 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.") (internal quotations and citations omitted). Plaintiff did not file any objections and the R&R will be adopted in full. vs. City of Phoenix, et al., Defendants. Alberto Torres, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-09-01477-PHX-ROS ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED. The Clerk shall close this case. DATED this 30th day of August, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?