Gill v. Napolitano et al

Filing 20

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's 15 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted by the Court. FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody is denied as moot and that this action is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court shall enter jgm accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 1/25/10. (SAT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Ravinder Singh Gill, vs. Petitioner, Janet Napolitano, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-09-1553-PHX-PGR (DKD) ORDER Since the petitioner, whose only claim in his habeas petition is that he should be released from immigration detention, has failed to file any objection to Magistrate Judge Duncan's recommendation that his habeas petition should be dismissed as moot because he is no longer in custody, and since the respondents have filed a Suggestion of Mootness (doc. #19) stating that the petitioner was released from detention on August 11, 2009 pursuant to an Order of Supervision, IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. #15) is accepted and adopted by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 for a Writ of habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody is denied as moot and that this action is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court shall enter 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 judgment accordingly. DATED this 25th day of January, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?