Kent v. Cummings et al
Filing
71
ORDER FROM CHAMBERS of the Honorable John W. Sedwick. The court adopts the 65 Report and Recommendation and base thereon the Plaintiff's 51 Motion for Order Directing ADOC to take specified action is denied. (ESL)
<![CDATA[
MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA JEREMY JOSEPH KENT THE HONORABLE JOHN W. SEDWICK PROCEEDINGS: ORDER FROM CHAMBERS v. ROBERT CUMMINGS CASE NO. 2:09-cv-01616 (JWS) Date: June 24, 2010
In a report at docket 65, Magistrate Judge Anderson recommends that plaintiff's motion at docket 51 directing ADOC to take specified actions be denied. The time for objections has run, and none have been filed. In a matter of this type, this court reviews the recommendation from the magistrate judge according to the following standard: All recommended conclusions of law and findings of fact as to which an objection is taken are reviewed de novo, while other recommended findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. Applying that standard, this court concludes that the report at docket 65 is in all respects correct. This court adopts the report at docket 65 and based thereon the motion at docket 51 is DENIED .
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
