Lindsey v. Williams et al
Filing
48
ORDER denying 25 Motion to Dismiss Case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/23/2010.(NVO)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Peter Michael Williams; Emilie Diane ) ) Halladay; Ljubomir Peter Atanasoff; John Robert Walston, Jr.; William Lee ) Morris, Jr.; and Stephanie A. Stromfors, ) ) ) Defendants. ) Mark Lewellyn Lindsey,
No. CV-09-1869-PHX-DGC ORDER
Plaintiff Mark Lindsey commenced this action by filing a pro se complaint against Defendants on September 9, 2009. Dkt. #1. Defendants Peter Williams and Emilie Halladay have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim to relief. Dkt. #25. Because Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint (Dkt. #31), the Court will deny the motion to dismiss the original complaint as moot. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. #25) is denied. DATED this 23rd day of March, 2010.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
