Briones v. Schriro et al

Filing 52

ORDER the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendants Gordon, Ickes, Burke, Shriro and Stewart are DISMISSED for failure to effect timely service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: (1) Defendant Haley is ordered to respond t o the surviving claims in the First Amended Complaint as recommended by Magistrate Judge Irwin in the Report and Recommendation. (2) The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including both summons and request for waiver forms for said Defendant. (3) Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of the Court within 20 days of the date of the filing of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 4/1/11. (KMG)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dora B. Schriro; et. al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On February 3, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Irwin issued a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 47). On February 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension to file objections, which was denied. (Docs. 48, 49). Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.") (internal quotations and citations omitted). vs. Christopher Edward Briones, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-09-01989-PHX-ROS (JRI) ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 full.

No objections being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendants Gordon, Ickes, Burke, Shriro and Stewart are DISMISSED for failure to effect timely service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: (1) Defendant Haley is ordered to respond to the surviving claims in the First Amended Complaint as recommended by Magistrate Judge Irwin in the Report and Recommendation. (2) The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including both summons and request for waiver forms for said Defendant. (3) Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of the Court within 20 days of the date of the filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order. (4) The United States Marshal shall retain the Summons, a copy of the First Amended Complaint, a copy of this Order, and a copy of Magistrate Judge Irwin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) for future use. (5) The United States Marshal shall notify Defendant Haley of the commencement of this action and request waiver of service of the summons pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The notice shall include a copy of this Order and a copy of Judge Irwin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12). The Marshall shall file waivers of service of the summons or requests for waivers that were returned as undeliverable as soon as they are received. If a waiver of service of summons is not returned by Defendants within thirty days from the date the request for waiver was sent by the Marshal, the Marshal shall: (a) Personally serve copies of the Summons, the First Amended Complaint, this Order, and Judge Irwin's Report and Recommendation upon Defendants pursuant to Rule 4(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. -2-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

(b) Within ten days after personal service is effected, file the return of service for the Defendants, along with evidence of the attempt to secure a waiver of service of the summons and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service upon the Defendants. The costs of service shall be enumerated on the return of service form (USM-285) and shall include the costs incurred by the Marshal for photocopying additional copies of the Summons, First Amended Complaint, this Order, and the Report and Recommendation, and for preparing new process receipt and return forms, if required. Costs of service will be taxed against the personally served Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) and (5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (6) Defendants who agree to waive service of the Summons and such amended complaint shall return signed waiver forms to the United States Marshal, and not to Plaintiff. (7) Said Defendants shall answer the First Amended Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (8) Any answer or responsive pleading shall state the specific Defendant(s) by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, responsive pleading, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant(s) by name on whose behalf it is filed. DATED this 1st day of April, 2011.

-3-